For my Guardian column today, I took the LibDem Lords to task for introducing legislation that would ban web-lockers because these services allow for copyright infringement. I won’t argue that copyright infringement takes place on services like Google Docs and YouSendIt, but the reason that these services are great for piracy is that they’re great for privacy: the same feature that lets me use YouSendIt to send a family member a private video of my kid in the bath is the feature that lets a copyright violator to share a pirated movie. And you can’t get rid of the copyright violations without eliminating our ability to privately share large files for legitimate reasons.

And separate from that, there’s the infrastructural cost of establishing a Great Firewall of Britain in order to block access to web lockers. Developing a system whereby parts of the net can be shut off for all of Britain creates the possibility that someone will use the system to shut off the wrong part of the net. I’m not just talking about the danger of a hijacker breaking into the system to shut down or redirect traffic to legitimate sites (say, Microsoft Security Centre or the BBC), but the attractive nuisance presented by such a system. Once you create the facility to shut off parts of the internet that are implicated in civil disputes, how long will it be before people who’ve alleged a libel or are worried about a trade secret being not so secret are lobbying to have this turned to their aid?

Which isn’t to say that this will actually stop infringement. File sharers have already demonstrated their ability to use the perfectly legal, widespread proxy services abroad to circumvent network blocks – ask any 14-year-old whose school network is censored by blocking software and I guarantee you’ll get an education in how to evade this kind of thing. Which is great news if you’re a pirate, but why should sound engineers, doting grandparents, and solicitors have to learn how to evade the Great Firewall in order to conduct their legitimate business?

My Lords, you can’t please the entertainment industry and sustain privacy

(Image: Lockers 3, a Creative Commons Attribution file from dizfunkshinal’s photostream)

My latest Locus magazine column, “Making Smarter Dumb Mistakes About the Future,” is about the ways that corporate futurism goes astray, imagining futures that make the boss happy which never come to pass. It’s based on the magnificent and wondrously wrong “Carousel of Progress” that Walt Disney creates for GE’s pavilion at the 1964 NYC World’s Fair, an updated version of which lives at Walt Disney World. I love that thing to bits. I wish it would fit on my desk, I’d put it there like the old poets used to keep a skull by their elbows, to remind them of their hubris and frailty.

Also, if I had one on my desk, I could stop dragging my family onto it. My wife has written a new chorous to the themesong (which goes, “There’s a great big beautiful tomorrow, shining at the end of every day”): “There’s a great big hairy Cory Doctorow, sitting in the front row every day.”

When confronted with a new technology and asked to predict its application, it’s tempting to look for existing, unsolved problems to which the technology might apply. For example, in a notorious early ad for personal computing, Honeywell depicted a satisfied, modish hausfrau cheerfully setting the dip-switches on her kitchen’s PC in order to recall recipes. It’s easy to follow their thinking: Computers are used by giant companies to store and manipulate files in the workplace. What files do housewives have to store and manipulate? Recipes! This is the “horseless carriage” fallacy: tomorrow’s world will be like today, but moreso. Faster transport will get us to the same places, but faster. Faster communications will let us talk to the same people, but better.

So it’s natural to think that HD television will be twice as unifying as old, standard-def sets (in fact, one of the big selling points for HD is that it will allow a small percentage of the household, usually Dad, to watch sports matches with his friends, while the rest of the family waits it out somewhere else).

Making Smarter Dumb Mistakes About the Future

Josh Swinehart made this cute procedural movie using my story Printcrime as a script. Cool!

Ben O’Steen got his maker on by printing out the entire text of Makers on a cash-register receipt, using a till printer. Awesome.