/ / Little Brother, News

Wouldya lookit that! I’ve won the Libertarian Futurist’s Society’s Prometheus Award for my novel Little Brother! As with all the other awards LB has been up for this year, I’m even more honored by the company I’m in than the award itself; this year’s Prometheus nominees included Charlie Stross’s Saturn’s Children, Matter by Iain Banks, The January Dancer by Michael Flyn, Opening Atlantis by Harry Turtledove, and Half a Crown, the wrenching conclusion to Jo Walton brilliant Farthing/Ha’penny alternate history trilogy. And this year’s Prometheus Hall of Fame winner was Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. These books and these writers are all incredibly humbling company to find oneself among.

The Prometheus will be given out at the WorldCon, and the award includes an actual, no-fooling gold coin. So yes, I’ll be walking around the Montreal Worldcon with a pocket full of gold, don’t tell anyone.

2009 PROMETHEUS AWARDS FINALISTS ANNOUNCED

/ / News

Wouldya lookit that! I’ve won the Libertarian Futurist’s Society’s Prometheus Award for my novel Little Brother! As with all the other awards LB has been up for this year, I’m even more honored by the company I’m in than the award itself; this year’s Prometheus nominees included Charlie Stross’s Saturn’s Children, Matter by Iain Banks, The January Dancer by Michael Flyn, Opening Atlantis by Harry Turtledove, and Half a Crown, the wrenching conclusion to Jo Walton brilliant Farthing/Ha’penny alternate history trilogy. And this year’s Prometheus Hall of Fame winner was Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. These books and these writers are all incredibly humbling company to find oneself among.

The Prometheus will be given out at the WorldCon, and the award includes an actual, no-fooling gold coin. So yes, I’ll be walking around the Montreal Worldcon with a pocket full of gold, don’t tell anyone.

2009 PROMETHEUS AWARDS FINALISTS ANNOUNCED

/ / News

Pablo from Tor has the details on a cool new promo they’re doing to promote my next book, Makers, which’ll be published in the fall (HarperCollins UK will publish it in the UK, Australia, NZ, and other parts of the commonwealth). Makers tells the story of a group of hardware hackers who fall in with microfinancing venture capitalists and reinvent the American economy after a total economic collapse, and who find themselves swimming with sharks, fighting with gangsters, and leading a band of global techno-revolutionaries. The first 50,000 words of Makers were serialized on Salon some years ago under the title Themepunks.


Starting today around noon (Eastern Standard Tribe, of course), and throughout the rest of the year, Tor.com will be serializing Makers, Cory Doctorow’s upcoming novel, which goes on sale from Tor Books in Novemb er. We’ll be serializing the entirety of the novel, with a new installment every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, until the whole thing is finished, sometime in January 2010. Each installment of Makers will be accompanied by a new illustration by Idiots’Books (idiotsbooks.com), which will interconnect with the other illustrations in the series, and offer limitless possibilities for mixing and matching the illustrations in the series. In a week or so, after we’ve posted a number of tiles, we’ll release a Flash game in which users will be able to re-arrange the illustration tiles on a grid and create their own combination of layouts.

I’m planning on repeating the tribute to booksellers I made with the free release of Little Brother, introducing every section of the serial with a little hymn to some bookstore or other; booksellers are clearly on the side of the angels (I speak as a former bookseller!).

However, I’m doing this one a little differently; rather than write up my favorite booksellers, I’m asking for your favorite bookstores — in the comments for each section of the serial, I’d like you to write up testimonials for your favorite stores. I’ll pick three every week to add to that week’s installments, by way of spreading the love around.

Announcing Cory Doctorow’s Makers on Tor.com

Cory Doctorow’s Makers, Part 1 (of 81)

(Thanks, Pablo!)

/ / News

My new Locus column, “Cheap Facts and the Plausible Premise,” explores what it means for science fiction when the cost of knowing something falls to zero, and when the difference between knowing something can be done and doing it narrows away to nothing.

Tell someone that her car has a chip-based controller that can be hacked to improve gas mileage, and you give her the keywords to feed into Google to find out how to do this, where to find the equipment to do it — even the firms that specialize in doing it for you.

In the age of cheap facts, we now inhabit a world where knowing something is possible is practically the same as knowing how to do it.

This means that invention is now a lot more like collage than like discovery.

Cheap Facts and the Plausible Premise

/ / News


Diane from the World Science Fiction Convention sez, “Just wanted to drop you a quick note to say that the voting deadline for the Hugo awards is this Friday. Eligible voters must vote online by July 3rd, 23:59PM EST. People should vote as early as possible in case of computer problems and to ensure their ballot is received before the deadline.”


You get a vote if you’re signed up to attend the WorldCon (it’s in Montreal this year). It’s one of the best Hugo ballots I’ve seen in all my years as an sf reader. And yes, I’m eligible twice, once for best novel (Little Brother) and again for best novella (True Names, with Ben Rosenbaum).

Final Ballot for the 2009 Hugo Awards
and John W. Campbell Award


/ / Little Brother, News


Diane from the World Science Fiction Convention sez, “Just wanted to drop you a quick note to say that the voting deadline for the Hugo awards is this Friday. Eligible voters must vote online by July 3rd, 23:59PM EST. People should vote as early as possible in case of computer problems and to ensure their ballot is received before the deadline.”


You get a vote if you’re signed up to attend the WorldCon (it’s in Montreal this year). It’s one of the best Hugo ballots I’ve seen in all my years as an sf reader. And yes, I’m eligible twice, once for best novel (Little Brother) and again for best novella (True Names, with Ben Rosenbaum).

Final Ballot for the 2009 Hugo Awards
and John W. Campbell Award


/ / News

My latest Guardian column, “When I’m dead, how will my loved ones break my password?” describes the process my wife and I went through when we drew up our wills and realized that our encrypted hard-drives and our network passwords would go with us if we died or were incapacitated, and how important it was for us to have a secure, long-term solution for decrypting our data if we croak.

I don’t want to simply hand the passphrase over to my wife, or my lawyer. Partly that’s because the secrecy of a passphrase known only to one person and never written down is vastly superior to the secrecy of a passphrase that has been written down and stored in more than one place. Further, many countries’s laws make it difficult or impossible for a court to order you to turn over your keys; once the passphrase is known by a third party, its security from legal attack is greatly undermined, as the law generally protects your knowledge of someone else’s keys to a lesser extent than it protects your own.

I discarded any solution based on putting my keys in trust with a service that sends out an email unless you tell it not to every week – these “dead man’s switch” services are far less deserving of my trust than, say, my wife or my solicitor.

I rejected a safe-deposit box because of all the horror stories I’ve heard of banks that refuse to allow access to boxes until the will is probated, and the data necessary to probate the will is in the box.

I pondered using something called Shamir’s Secret Sharing Scheme (SSSS), a fiendishly clever crypto scheme that allows you to split a key into several pieces, in such a way that only a few of those pieces are needed to unlock the data. For example, you might split the key into 10 pieces and give them to 10 people such that any five of them can pool their pieces and gain access to your crypto-protected data. But I rejected this, too – too complicated to explain to civilians, and what’s more, if the key could be recovered by five people getting together, I now had to trust that no five out of 10 people would act in concert against me. And I’d have to keep track of those 10 people for the rest of my life, ensuring that the key is always in a position to be recovered. Too many moving parts – literally.

When I’m dead, how will my loved ones break my password?