Cory Doctorow's


RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URL to TrackBack this entry is:

  1. I like the idea, but I don’t think it would work. If a government tells you “don’t reveal that you’ve given us data”, the same government – through its police and justice systems, which it controls to some degree – is not going to brook “well, I only revealed it through *inaction*” as a defense.

    A dead man’s switch only works when its operation *cannot* be bypassed under duress. You’d need to be able to credibly argue that there was *no plausible way* for you to prevent the switch from activating for there to be a shred of a chance that you’d come away from this without sanction.

    Comment by Darren M — September 10, 2013 @ 8:22 am

  2. I disagree. A ‘Gag Order’ cannot require the recipient to actively pursue secrecy or commit to false information like(which can be construed as fraud when performed by a private entity). It only prevents the recipient from informing the nature/content of the issue under the Gag order (and possibly the existance of). So the defense position is simply, “I can neither confirm nor deny …” It is up to the observer to infer the results of the ‘dead man switch’.

    Comment by Richard R — October 2, 2013 @ 4:45 am

  3. That was a great talk on KQED Forum. I heard recently that it was possible, by “design,” to break encryption. Also, quantum computing is here and that is supposed to be able to rapidly factor large numbers.

    While the NSA, etc., may be able to break any single encryption, there’s always some limit as to how many of them they can break at any one time. I’ve heard that the NSA stores anything encrypted, indefinitely. So a lot of encrypted innocuous messages might be stored indefinitely. Presumably, that could eat a lot of storage.

    I suspect they would then try to hack that person’s computer, to get the messages before they were encrypted. In Ubuntu 13.04, Ubuntu Linux has asserted a desire to do keystroke logging, with an opt out for specific programs. However, the names of the underlying programs may not be available, and even its default Gnome Desktop Nautilus File Manager goes by the name of “File Manager.”

    Also, I recently saw an unnamed update offered for Ubuntu 13.04. There’s no telling what it could have been.

    The time intervals for the “Dead Man’s Switch” don’t seem to account for latencies, such as site crashes, etc.

    Whereas I might reluctantly submit to NSA surveillance, The thought of allowing business competitors (private contractors?) and thieves to access my computer is intolerable.

    Comment by Byron Hale — October 2, 2013 @ 3:20 pm

  4. PS: Installing new programs on Ubuntu now seems to require additional opt-outs.

    Comment by Byron Hale — October 2, 2013 @ 3:21 pm

  5. Hm… Not even “File Manager,” I guess, but “Files.”

    Comment by Byron Hale — October 2, 2013 @ 8:22 pm

  6. The jury is still out on quantum computers. The less NSA surveillance, the better.

    Many elements of quantum computing are in place, but the real deal has not been publicly verified.

    Revelations on NSA surveillance have gone from bad to worse. To grasp the human dimension, see “Other Peoples’ Lives,” about East German Stasi surveillance.

    Comment by Byron Hale — November 8, 2013 @ 1:41 pm

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Close this window.

0.033 Powered by WordPress